Skip to main content

Structuring Arbitration Awards

Like a judgement/verdict (unless on appeal) 99% of the time an arbitration award,especially if it is binding, cannot use a structured settlement as part of the distribution of settlement proceeds. The reason for this is that there are specific things, which are defined in Internal Revenue Code (IRC) 104(a)(2), which need to be adhered to to make a structured settlement income tax free in the eyes of the IRS.  The two most important items in the Code affecting an arbitration award are as follows:

1.) Both plaintiff and defendant must agree to a structured settlement. Because an arbitration is like a verdict or judgement in that BOTH sides are not agreeing to it this is usually is a deal killer when it comes to trying to structure an arbitration.

2.) The settlement funds funding the structured settlement cannot be constructively received by the plaintiff. This includes funds that are deposited into the plaintiff attorney's IOLTA account since they are technically an agent of the plaintiff. The funds funding the structured settlement portion of the settlement must go directly from the defendant or their insurer to the entity funding the structured settlement payments.

I said that 99% of the time an arbitration cannot use a structured settlement because we have successfully used them in a few arbitration cases over the years IF both of the conditions above are agreed to AND the life insurance company funding the structured settlement payments agrees to cooperate.

If you have an arbitration award and would like us to determine whether a structured settlement can be used please contact us and DO NOT have any checks issued or documents drafted.

For 20 years we have been Michigan's best and only plaintiff focused structured settlement adviser. www.whitehousellc.com  (734) 433-1670  cyril@whitehousellc.com

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

DON'T LET THIS HAPPEN TO YOUR CLIENT!!!

This week I was contacted by the father of a young man, let’s call the young man Joe who is age 20.  Joe had suffered a traumatic brain injury as the result of an auto accident and had received a settlement of $50,000.  Joe’s father was concerned because Joe had already blown through half his settlement in a month due to his discovery of cocaine, which some new “friends” he was spending a lot of time with introduced him to.
Joe’s father had heard of something called a Structured Settlement, which he thought may help preserve the remainder of Joe’s settlement from being squandered.  Structured Settlements are a financial vehicle which have been around since the 1980’s that facilitate receiving a legal settlement with interest income tax free over time and can sometimes have benefits over receiving the settlement all at once in a lump sum, as in this case.
Joe’s father contacted me because my firm, White House Settlement Consulting that I founded in 2001, has been helping injury victi…