Skip to main content

Structuring Arbitration Awards

Like a judgement/verdict (unless on appeal) 99% of the time an arbitration award,especially if it is binding, cannot use a structured settlement as part of the distribution of settlement proceeds. The reason for this is that there are specific things, which are defined in Internal Revenue Code (IRC) 104(a)(2), which need to be adhered to to make a structured settlement income tax free in the eyes of the IRS.  The two most important items in the Code affecting an arbitration award are as follows:

1.) Both plaintiff and defendant must agree to a structured settlement. Because an arbitration is like a verdict or judgement in that BOTH sides are not agreeing to it this is usually is a deal killer when it comes to trying to structure an arbitration.

2.) The settlement funds funding the structured settlement cannot be constructively received by the plaintiff. This includes funds that are deposited into the plaintiff attorney's IOLTA account since they are technically an agent of the plaintiff. The funds funding the structured settlement portion of the settlement must go directly from the defendant or their insurer to the entity funding the structured settlement payments.

I said that 99% of the time an arbitration cannot use a structured settlement because we have successfully used them in a few arbitration cases over the years IF both of the conditions above are agreed to AND the life insurance company funding the structured settlement payments agrees to cooperate.

If you have an arbitration award and would like us to determine whether a structured settlement can be used please contact us and DO NOT have any checks issued or documents drafted.

For 20 years we have been Michigan's best and only plaintiff focused structured settlement adviser. www.whitehousellc.com  (734) 433-1670  cyril@whitehousellc.com

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Michigan Association of Justice Workers Compensation Seminar

We had an awesome time at the Michigan Association of Justice Worker's Compensation seminar where Cyril spoke on the best strategies for using structured settlements in Worker's Compensation cases. Click the link below to watch the short video of his presentation!   Click Here to Watch Video! www.whitehousellc.com

Using a structured settlement annuity pre-suit

 We recently were engaged by the Guardian Ad Litem (GAL) in the case of an 11 year old boy who was struck by a care while riding his bike.  The father of the boy settled the case directly with the liability auto insurance carrier pre-suit and the GAL contacted us to ensure that the boy's settlement funds were handled appropriately. The case settled for a total of $65,000 and $59,000 was being allocated to the structured settlement annuity for the boy as follows: $5,000 paid immediately upon settlement $10,000 at age 18 $20,000 at age 21 $25,000 at age 25 $35,718 at age 30 this is total benefits of $95,718! The annuity was placed with a large life insurance company rated A+ by the A.M. Best rating agency and provided the family and GAL with the peace of mind that the young man would not receive the entire amount at age 18. In addition, due to the use of the structured settlement annuity, all of the interest gained during the payout period ($31,718 to be exact) is INCOME TAX FREE!  T

Thomas Bond Benefits of Structured Settlement Video

Please watch this excellent video where e xperienced and successful personal injury attorney, Thomas M. Bond from the firm of Kaplan/Bond in Boston tells you why a structured settlement is the best choice for the longterm financial security for you and your family when your lawsuit settles for a large sum. Hear how one man made the wrong choice and tragically lost everything. www.whitehousellc.com