Skip to main content

Roth IRA vs. Traditional IRA


Individual Retirement Accounts (IRA) come in two types, Roth and Traditional, and there are several basic differences between them. 

The biggest difference between these two types of IRAs deals with how the distributions are taxed.  Traditional IRAs allow the IRA holder to take a current tax year deduction for the amount which they contributed to the IRA up to an annual limit.  When the IRA holder takes a distribution out of the IRA during retirement, however, each dollar of the distribution is taxed as income in the year it is withdrawn.  Thus any investment earnings in the traditional IRA are taxed deferred until withdrawn. Earnings in a Roth IRA, however, are tax free when withdrawn, but do not provide a current tax year deduction. 

For those covered by an employer sponsored retirement plan traditional IRAs have income limits pertaining to the amount that the account holder may deduct on their taxes; however, anyone can make a nondeductible contribution regardless of income.  Conversely, you may only contribute to a Roth IRA if your income is below a certain amount.

Another difference is that Roth IRAs do not require a Required Minimum Distributions (RMD) from the account when the account holder reaches age 70 ½ where traditional IRAs do.
Finally, with a traditional IRA there is a 10% penalty on withdrawals prior to attaining age 59 ½ unless an exception applies.  For Roth IRAs this penalty only applies to the earnings withdrawn and not the contribution amount.

Please note that we do not provide tax advice and you should consult with a qualified tax advisor regarding any tax questions. 

White House Financial & Settlement Consulting helps families live an easier and less stressful life through the proper management of their financial resources.  We do this by acting as our clients’ trusted advisor providing a personal touch customized to the client’s needs!  Please visit our web site at www.whitehousellc.com for more information!

Popular posts from this blog

Michigan Association of Justice Workers Compensation Seminar

We had an awesome time at the Michigan Association of Justice Worker's Compensation seminar where Cyril spoke on the best strategies for using structured settlements in Worker's Compensation cases. Click the link below to watch the short video of his presentation!   Click Here to Watch Video! www.whitehousellc.com

Using a structured settlement annuity pre-suit

 We recently were engaged by the Guardian Ad Litem (GAL) in the case of an 11 year old boy who was struck by a care while riding his bike.  The father of the boy settled the case directly with the liability auto insurance carrier pre-suit and the GAL contacted us to ensure that the boy's settlement funds were handled appropriately. The case settled for a total of $65,000 and $59,000 was being allocated to the structured settlement annuity for the boy as follows: $5,000 paid immediately upon settlement $10,000 at age 18 $20,000 at age 21 $25,000 at age 25 $35,718 at age 30 this is total benefits of $95,718! The annuity was placed with a large life insurance company rated A+ by the A.M. Best rating agency and provided the family and GAL with the peace of mind that the young man would not receive the entire amount at age 18. In addition, due to the use of the structured settlement annuity, all of the interest gained during the payout period ($31,718 to be exact) is INCOME TAX FREE!  T

Thomas Bond Benefits of Structured Settlement Video

Please watch this excellent video where e xperienced and successful personal injury attorney, Thomas M. Bond from the firm of Kaplan/Bond in Boston tells you why a structured settlement is the best choice for the longterm financial security for you and your family when your lawsuit settles for a large sum. Hear how one man made the wrong choice and tragically lost everything. www.whitehousellc.com